Score: 10

"One word: Awesome"

submission: Music Catch 2

date: September 7, 2009

Idea/Concept: 10/10
Sound: 10/10 (I'd give you 11/10 if I could!)
Graphics (including animation, smoothness, etc.): 10/10
Synchronization/Timing (between sound and graphics): 10/10

Overall: 10/10

I have never given any game on newgrounds all 10, but this is one that I will give 10 and will never stop playing.

Score: 9

"Cool!"

submission: Gravity based movement

date: July 21, 2009

Some people like action, some people like these pointless games, and I belong to the second group. So...

Graphics: 10/10
Sound: (no sound)
Clarity: 10/10
Usefulness: 8/10 (can be used to teach science, at least that's what I think, heheh)
'Lastingness' of game play/impact: 8/10

Overall: 9/10

Score: 1

"Some are true, some are fake."

submission: Singapore Crazy Laws

date: July 10, 2009

Read the title. And how do I know? I'm a Singaporean. And you should go and reflect on what you have done, because you have said you are a Singaporean. By the way, the 1 star was for your effort which I pity because it was wasted.

Score: 9

"Hmm..."

submission: Cops & Robbers

date: June 17, 2009

It was boring but all right.

Creativity: 9/10
Idea: 9/10
Graphics: 10/10
Audio: 9/10
Ease Of Play: 9/10

Total: 46/50
Overall: 9/10 (After rounding from 9.2)

Score: 9

"Good but hard"

submission: Ninja Practice

date: June 17, 2009

See the title. It says it all. Also, it needs more variety!

Creativity: 9/10
Idea: 9/10
Graphics: 10/10
Difficulty/Ease Of Play: 7/10

Total: 35/40
Overall: 9/10 (after rounding from 8.75)

Score: 9

"Good game, I finished it, but repetitive"

submission: Global One Water Game

date: June 17, 2009

See the title. It says it all.

Creativity: 10/10
Idea: 9/10 (repetitive)
Graphics: 8/10 (worsened as more pumps became available)
Audio: 9/10
Level Style: 9/10 (again repetitive)

Total: 45/50
Overall: 9/10

Score: 9

"Absolutely nice but..."

submission: Virtual iPhone Version4.2

date: June 17, 2009

The title says it all. Absolutely nice but lacks some features. It would have been better if you added more features, but this was very well done!

Creativity: 10/10
Animation: 9/10
Sounds: 9/10
Visuals: 10/10 (for the effort of finding them :P)
Scripting: 9/10 (needs to stop music automatically, etc.)

Total: 47 out of a possible 50
Overall: 9/10 (after rounding from 9.4)

Score: 10

"Awesome!"

submission: T E T R I S ' D

date: June 9, 2009

One word: Awesome!

It was smooth and simple and not too cluttered. It was also consistent and not choppy.

Score: 10

"Chat programming is great!"

submission: Windows Doors Demo

date: June 5, 2009

Me too. I only played chat. It was very well programmed to fit what I said.

Score: 4

"Pointless."

submission: Thanks for all the fish!

date: January 21, 2009

I don't get it. Sorry. I don't mean to give you a low score.